The War Over Counsel – A Cry From Samaria by Tania Curado Koenig

A little long, but another outstanding article by Tania. Straight from the land of Israel. What a love she has for Israel and the covenant of God. Rh

From my balcony on Itzchak Kariv Street, the Old City lies before me, its stones catching the first thin light. The Tower of David catches the first gleam of the sun, and the stones along Mount Zion turn from grey to gold. The air is still, carrying the faint smell of olives and dust. Below, the streets are empty; only the soft hum of the waking city moves through the valley. It is one of those moments when Jerusalem feels suspended between heaven and history — unchanging in appearance, yet alive with the weight of decisions being written far beyond these walls.

Inside, my notes from Thursday’s meeting with Governor Yossi Dagan cover the table. His words still fill the room. They echo the headlines arriving by the hour — renewed pressure from Washington, the Istanbul declaration, and Israel’s unresolved struggle over sovereignty in Judea and Samaria.

When Bill and I met Dagan in Jerusalem on 30 October, I asked whether he was disappointed. “Yes,” he said — and began to explain why.

In late September, after President Trump publicly told Arab partners that his renewed peace framework would exclude any annexation of Judea and Samaria, Dagan booked a flight to New York. “I went to speak with the prime minister before he met the president,” he said. “It was the last chance to talk about Judea and Samaria.”

He met Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for nearly two hours on the eve of the 29 September White House meeting. Dagan, who has known him for twenty years, expected debate; he found resignation.

“When I looked at his eyes,” Dagan said, “I saw a woman who has been raped — violated, stripped of choice. That’s what had been done to him. There was nothing left to say. I changed my own speech after that.”

For Dagan, the image was not anger but diagnosis: a leader already constrained by forces beyond the room.

The following day Netanyahu and Trump presented their twenty-point regional framework. Annexation was missing. Washington’s goal was to consolidate Arab partners after the August strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites. Keeping that coalition intact meant postponing Israeli sovereignty. The calculation was strategic; the cost, national. Dagan left New York convinced that the decision on Judea and Samaria had been made elsewhere.

Five weeks later, the same pattern appeared again. In a CBS 60 Minutes interview aired 2 November, Trump said he had “pushed Netanyahu” to accept the Gaza cease-fire and that the U.S. would “be involved” in the Israeli premier’s criminal trial “to help him out.” Whatever the intention, the effect confirmed Dagan’s private description: policy and justice influenced from outside.

Meanwhile, Turkey and six allied Muslim states met in Istanbul on 3 November, declaring that Gaza’s reconstruction “must be Palestinian-led and free of foreign hegemony.” It was a diplomatic move to assert Muslim stewardship over Gaza’s future — another conversation about Israel held without Israel in the room.

The Istanbul meeting also revealed a deeper alignment taking shape: Ankara and Riyadh finding cautious common ground after years of rivalry, both intent on shaping a post-Gaza regional order. Diplomats in Amman and Cairo now describe a “Muslim-Arab coordination framework” designed to pre-empt Western trusteeship plans and keep reconstruction funds under regional control. It is the kind of quiet restructuring that redraws influence maps without a single shot fired.

Inside Israel, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich speaks of annexation maps and preparatory committees, but no formal act of sovereignty has been announced. Analysts now call it “de facto annexation without de jure decision.” For Dagan, that phrase describes exactly what he feared in New York: when sovereignty is deferred, it is already being surrendered.

The political opposition is divided on how to answer it. Centrist parties accuse the government of “diplomatic paralysis,” while coalition hard-liners call for a declaration of sovereignty before the next American election cycle. Behind the scenes, senior security officials warn that any unilateral step could freeze cooperation with Jordan and the Gulf. The argument has moved from ideology to timing — how long Israel can wait before delay becomes default.

As head of the Samaria Regional Council, Dagan oversees forty communities and about forty thousand residents. His work is administrative — zoning, roads, schools, security coordination — but its purpose is political: to make Israeli law a living fact in areas still governed by interim arrangements.

“We build factories, kindergartens, roads,” he said. “But the signature is still missing.”

To Dagan, the fight is not ideological but structural — who drafts Israel’s decisions before they are announced. Annexation, he believes, was lost not in debate but in pre-decision counsel — the quiet briefings where diplomatic logic overrode conviction. “Before borders move,” he told us, “voices move.”

Dagan often contrasts two Israels. One lives by covenant, grounded in the belief that Judea and Samaria are inseparable from national identity. The other lives by contract, prioritizing alignments that postpone decisions. The tension between them now defines Israeli politics: conviction weighed against caution, and action delayed by diplomacy.

From my balcony in Mamilla, the Old City glows under the first light of morning. The rays of sunlight spread slowly across the ancient stones, carrying echoes of prayers and promises spoken through centuries. The walls look unchanged, but every negotiation still reverberates against them — reminders that power shifts, but covenant endures.

Here in Jerusalem, history and eternity breathe in the same air. Decisions are debated in far capitals, yet this city remains what she has always been: the heart of a promise made by God Himself. Governments may write policies; only He writes destiny.

As the sun rises, the gold deepens on the domes and rooftops, and Jerusalem stands radiant — the city of the Almighty, the wife of the Judge of the universe. Politics may pass, leaders may falter, but His promises remain unchangeable, and His love over her endures forever.

ISRAEL – A BONE OF CONTENTION

That is what we read in Ezekiel 36:19-24, when God speaks about the Jewish people living in disobedience: “So I scattered them among the nations, and they were dispersed throughout the countries; I judged them according to their ways and their deeds. When they came to the nations, wherever they went, they profaned My holy name—when they said of them, ‘These are the people of the Lord, and yet they have gone out of His land.’ But I had concern for My holy name, which the house of Israel had profaned among the nations wherever they went. ‘Therefore say to the house of Israel, ‘Thus says the Lord God: ‘I do not do this for your sake, O house of Israel, but for My holy name’s sake, which you have profaned among the nations wherever you went. And I will sanctify My great name, which has been profaned among the nations, which you have profaned in their midst; and the nations shall know that I am the Lord,’ says the Lord God, ‘when I am hallowed in you before their eyes. For I will take you from among the nations, gather you out of all countries, and bring you into your own land.”

The sad reality is that more and more Christians are embracing replacement theology, which teaches that either the church has replaced Israel or it is the “real and true Israel.” Many even believe that modern-day Israel is just a result of political operatives after World War II, and therefore, it has no business being discussed at the pulpit.

None of those Christian leaders and churches that embrace replacement theology would disagree that God literally scattered the Jewish people to the four corners of the earth as a result of their disobedience. They take no issue with that. However, when it comes to Israel’s regathering, somehow, they shift gears. They go to great lengths to try to prove that God doesn’t really mean what He says.

In Genesis 15:18, we read, “On the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying: ‘To your descendants I have given this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the River Euphrates’”

In Genesis 17:7-8, God says, “I will establish My covenant between Me and you and your descendants after you in their generations, for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and your descendants after you. Also I give to you and your descendants after you the land in which you are a stranger, all the land of Canaan, as an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.”

Psalm 105:8-11 powerfully states, “He remembers His covenant forever, The word which He commanded, for a thousand generations, The covenant which He made with Abraham, And His oath to Isaac, And confirmed it to Jacob for a statute, To Israel as an everlasting covenant, Saying, ‘To you I will give the land of Canaan As the allotment of your inheritance.’”

When God made this covenant with Abraham some 4,000 years ago, Abraham was in a deep sleep, and God swore it by Himself: “For when God made a promise to Abraham, because He could swear by no one greater, He swore by Himself” (Hebrews 6:13). Thus, as we read in Ezekiel 36, it is God’s name that is at stake because of the promises that He has made.

Jeremiah 23:7-8 states, “‘Therefore, behold, the days are coming,’ says the Lord, ‘that they shall no longer say, ‘As the Lord lives who brought up the children of Israel from the land of Egypt,’ but, ‘As the Lord lives who brought up and led the descendants of the house of Israel from the north country and from all the countries where I had driven them.’ And they shall dwell in their own land.’”

Jeremiah 31:8-10 reads, “Behold, I will bring them from the north country, And gather them from the ends of the earth, Among them the blind and the lame, The woman with child And the one who labors with child, together; A great throng shall return there. They shall come with weeping, And with supplications I will lead them. I will cause them to walk by the rivers of waters, In a straight way in which they shall not stumble; For I am a Father to Israel, And Ephraim is My firstborn. ‘Hear the word of the Lord, O nations, And declare it in the isles afar off, and say, ‘He who scattered Israel will gather him, And keep him as a shepherd does his flock.’”

Can it be any more clear? Here is one more verse that should silence all of the naysayers: “Thus says the Lord, Who gives the sun for a light by day, The ordinances of the moon and the stars for a light by night, Who disturbs the sea, And its waves roar (The Lord of hosts is His name): ‘If those ordinances depart From before Me, says the Lord, Then the seed of Israel shall also cease From being a nation before Me forever’” (Jeremiah 31:35-36).

In other words, as long as the sun, moon, and stars are shining in the sky and the function of this world is intact, Israel is going to remain before God forever as a nation. Period.

Pray for the peace of Jerusalem! I will always stand with Israel. They are not perfect, neither are we in America, but we honor the Lord God Almighty and his faithfulness. God is not a man who can lie, His Word is steadfast, you can stand on it! Rh

Tony Blair:

One of the Bottlenecks in an Impossible Deal

By Tania Curado Koenig

Washington, D.C. — Oct. 1, 2025

This deal seems to be an establishment scheme to pour $ into Gaza rather than a true peace effort. Billions are at stake! Once again Tania has knocked it out of the park. Rh

Among the many bottlenecks in the Trump framework for Gaza, one is glaring: the sudden return of Tony Blair. His name was written into the plan as co-chair of the ‘Board of Peace.’ But the world’s reaction shows why this appointment is a liability, not a solution.

Credibility questions immediately surface. The Guardian called his proposed role ‘laced with fatal flaws,’ noting the failures of his tenure as Quartet envoy. AP reminded readers that Blair carries heavy baggage from Iraq and previous Middle East ventures that achieved little.

Perceived bias further erodes legitimacy. Palestinians and Arab commentators see him as aligned with Israel and Western interests. The Financial Times reports Arab and European officials fear the Gaza plan is already skewed toward Israeli priorities, lacking Palestinian legitimacy.

Economic focus over politics is also Blair’s hallmark. His style is development, investment, and oversight. But economic fixes without true sovereignty or political empowerment have never brought peace. They usually collapse.

Palestinian rejection is fierce. Hamas officials explicitly say, ‘Blair has no role here.’ A Gazan displaced by war told AP, ‘This man has the blood of Iraqis on his hands.’ Mustafa Barghouti compared his reappearance to returning British colonialism. Mahmoud Habbash, adviser to Mahmoud Abbas, insisted: ‘The only side that can administer Gaza is a Palestinian government.’ Even West Bank PA officials said no plan can be imposed externally.

At home, Blair is divisive. In the UK, his name still triggers controversy. Labour MPs and activists condemn his Iraq legacy. His reappearance in the Middle East stirs opposition in his own country.

This is more than an irritant — it is a structural bottleneck. A plan that inserts figures already rejected by Palestinians, mistrusted by Arabs, and controversial at home reveals its own fragility. It risks being seen not as peace, but as foreign guardianship dressed up as governance.

1. Why Blair, despite all the baggage?

• Gravitas to outsiders: For Washington and Europe, Blair still carries a former-PM aura. Even if he is toxic to Palestinians, his name signals ‘serious statesmanship’ to Western publics.

• Economic entry point: Blair’s strength is not political reconciliation, but economic reconstruction and private capital mobilization. If Trump wants Gulf billions to flow into Gaza, Blair’s networks with banks, development funds, and corporations are useful.

• Cover for Trump: By putting Blair as ‘chair’ beside himself, Trump shifts optics — he is not alone, but backed by an ‘international statesman.’ This cushions accusations of unilateralism.

• Foil for rejection: If the plan collapses, Blair can be the fall guy. Trump walks away saying, ‘We tried, even Blair was there, but Hamas/Palestinians refused.’

2. The deeper Trump method

• Every clause is leverage. He doesn’t expect Hamas to fully comply (72-hour hostages, disarmament). These are traps designed to force Hamas and Qatar into an impossible corner.

• Every figure is a signal. Blair isn’t about Gaza legitimacy; he is about signaling to Gulf/European donors: ‘Your man is at the table, so you should pay.’

• Every failure is still a win. If Hamas refuses → Israel gets legitimacy, Arab bloc blames Hamas, Trump gets credit for ‘trying.’ If Hamas accepts partially → Trump claims history, Blair can take operational heat, and Trump drives normalization.

3. What this could mean later

• Blair as bridge to Saudi funds: Riyadh has long liked ‘technocratic committees’ and international faces to mask normalization. Blair’s presence could make Saudi/UAE more comfortable committing billions while keeping PA language alive.

• Blair as disposable pawn: If Palestinian rejection becomes loud, Blair can be dropped without the plan collapsing — Trump stays central, Blair vanishes.

• Blair as buffer for Trump: Any failure or unpopular measure gets blamed on Blair’s ‘management,’ preserving Trump’s stature.

4. What we must hold 

• Trump doesn’t waste moves. Blair is not there to solve Gaza politically — he is there to give Trump cover, Gulf comfort, and donor access. In the covenant reality, it will not ‘divide the land,’ but politically it allows Trump to say: ‘I built the widest coalition ever — even Blair, even the Gulf, even Europe stood with me.’

One more bottleneck, one more reason this deal cannot stand. ‘They shall not divide the land’ (Joel 3:2).

Jews Are Not Just a People, But They are A Testimony

Below is an excellent article that captures so very much about the stamina and drive of the Jewish people and a small nation called Israel. Rh

This is an excellent article by Alister Heath, a British journalist for the Daily Telegraph:

There’s something about Israel that makes people uncomfortable, and it’s not what they say it is.

They’ll point to politics, settlements, borders, and wars. But scratch beneath the outrage, and you’ll find something deeper. A discomfort not with what Israel does, but with what Israel is.

A nation this small should not be this strong. Period.

Israel has no oil. No special natural resources. A population barely the size of a mid-sized American city. They are surrounded by enemies. Hated in the United Nations. Targeted by terror. Condemned by celebrities. Boycotted, slandered, and attacked.

And still, they thrive like there’s no tomorrow.

In military. In medicine. In security. In technology. In agriculture. In intelligence. In morality. In sheer, unbreakable will.

They turn desert into farmland.

They make water from air.

They intercept rockets in mid-air.

They rescue hostages under the nose of the world’s worst regimes.

They survive wars that were supposed to wipe them out, and win.

The world watches this and can’t make sense of it.

So they do what people do when they witness strength they can’t understand.

They assume it must be cheating.

It must be American aid.

It must be foreign lobbying.

It must be oppression.

It must be theft.

It must be some dark trick that gave the Jews this kind of power.

It must be blackmail.

Because heaven forbid it’s something else.

Heaven forbid it’s real.

Heaven forbid it’s earned.

Or worse, destined.

The Jewish people were supposed to disappear a long, long time ago. That’s how the story of exiled, enslaved, hated minorities is supposed to end. But the Jews didn’t disappear. They actually came home, rebuilt their land, revived their language, and brought their dead back to life — in memory, in identity, and in strength.

That’s not normal.

It’s not political.

It’s biblical.

There’s no cheat code that explains how a group of people return to their homeland after 2,000 years.

There is no rational path from gas chambers to global influence.

And there is no historical precedent for surviving the Babylonians, the Romans, the Crusaders, the Inquisition, the pogroms, and the Holocaust, and still showing up to work on Monday in Tel Aviv.

Israel doesn’t make sense.

Unless you believe in something beyond the math.

This is what drives the world crazy. Because if Israel is real, if this improbable, ancient, hated nation is somehow still chosen, protected, and thriving, then maybe God isn’t a myth after all.

Maybe He’s still in the story.

Maybe history isn’t random.

Maybe evil doesn’t get the last word.

Maybe the Jews are not just a people… but a testimony.

That’s what they can’t stand.

Because once you admit that Israel’s survival isn’t just impressive, but divine, everything changes. Your moral compass has to reset. Your assumptions about history, power, and justice collapse. You realize you’re not watching the end of an empire. You’re witnessing the beginning of something eternal.

So they deny it.

They smear it.

And rage against it.

Because it’s easier to call a miracle “cheating” than to face the possibility that God keeps His promises.

And He’s keeping them still!