Gen Z Females Abandoning the Church

The cultural issues of the day are fascinating to me.  Part of what Moral Conservative strives to do is take current events and put them into the perspective of the end time scenarios.  What moves segments of the population and why. There is a troubling trend of young Gen Z (born from 1997-2012), leaving the church

 in droves.  In my opinion the biggest problem of this exodus from the church is a lack of moral fortitude to present not only a true Biblical Worldview, but also lackluster and timid Biblical preaching and teaching.  The Church is in  war and that war must be won by those who know their God and are able to fight and defend the principles of their faith.  Our battles are fought in the spiritual realm.  

Unfortunately the rise of the liberal agenda and the promotion of all things gender specific is a main culprit. Let’s take a look at some statistics.

54% of female Gen Z ages 12-27 have left the church for the following reasons:

65% because of unfair treatment of women

47% of LGBTQ mistreatment

30% identify as some form of LGBTQ (more on that later)

61% are feminist 

Over 50% want NO limits on abortion

In simple terms liberals and gender fluidity are important to this group of young women.

Let’s talk a moment about what I call the “Gender Mafia”.  Speak ill of this new religion and one can be quickly canceled or called a narrow minded hateful bigot.  Proud to say I have been identified as that on many occasions.  This new religion that seems to be sweeping the world might just be the old Babylonian goddess of Ishtar.  Part of Ishtar’s popularity was that she was one of the original female deities of the Mesopotamian pantheon.  She was often credited as being a goddess of love, sex, and fertility.  After all, what better role model than this ancient goddess of love and sex for our you liberal feminist to worship.  If you think I am being too harsh, just think back to a few years ago when pro abortion women were screaming at the top of their lungs in front of the Supreme Court for the “right” to kill their unborn child. 

Ecclesiastes 1:9 “there is nothing new under the Sun”.  Rh

Michigan Imam: We Muslims Will Yet ‘Slaughter’ the Jews ‘Like Sheep’ by Joshua Klein Breitbart News

Muslims will yet “slaughter” the Jews “like sheep” when the opportunity arises, according to a Michigan Islamic cleric who appealed to Allah, seeking to become “soldiers” for Islam in any form desired, including death.

In a sermon at the Islamic Center of Warren, Michigan, in January, Imam Abdou Zindani warned of the fate of Jews everywhere, pointing to a Palestinian businessman who told a Jewish New Yorker what Muslims have in store for the Jews. 

Unfortunately this is the new America. The Bush promoted religion of peace is now strong enough in America to say the quiet part for all to hear. We are importing our own destruction. Remember the Islamist say “we will come for the Saturday people first (Jews) and then the Sunday people (Christians). Islam is a convert or die movement. RH

“Don’t worry, don’t worry, Jewish man,” he said. “One day will come, and we will slaughter you like a sheep and the stone and the tree will work… undercover for us, [saying:] ‘Hey Muslim, come, there is somebody hiding here, get up and kill him.’”

The Sheikh was apparently referencing a grisly passage in the Islamic text, known as the Hadith, that reads as follows: “Judgement Day will not come until the Muslims fight the Jews. The Jews will hide behind the stones and the trees, and the stones and the trees will say, oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew hiding behind me — come and kill him.” The same excerpt is cited in the Hamas terror group’s charter.

Supreme Court Denies Case of Christian Parents Whose Trans-Identifying Child Was Taken From Them By Talla Wise CBN

The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to take up the case of two Indiana parents who asked the court to intervene after the state’s Department of Child Services took their trans-identifying child away from them due to their Biblical beliefs about sex and gender.

This week the high court denied a writ of certiorari in the case of M.C., et vir v. Indiana Department of Child Services (DCS) submitted by Jeremy and Mary Cox.

The Indiana Family Institute along with Becket Law, a non-profit legal group, presented the petition on behalf of the parents who wanted the Supreme Court to hold the state accountable for removing their child from their home. 

Our world is becoming increasingly combative against Biblical Family values and parental rights. How can the Supreme Court rule against loving parents who are raising their own children accordingly to their values. Why is evil being accepted and traditional values under attack. Conclusion (IMO) evil and demonic powers are feeding off our immoral society. RH

“No other loving parents should have to endure what we did. The pain of having our son taken from our home and kept from our care because of our beliefs will stay with us forever,” said the couple in a statement after the Supreme Court’s announcement. 

“We can’t change the past, but we will continue to fight for a future where parents of faith can raise their children without fear of state officials knocking on their doors and taking their children,” they added. 

As CBN News previously reported, DCS initiated an investigation of the Cox’s home because they were not referring to their son with a cross-gender name and pronouns, nor were they endorsing their child’s self-identification as a girl because of their Christian beliefs.

DCS pressed for the child’s removal from the home arguing, “We just feel that at this point in time… she should be in a home where she is [accepted] for who she is.”

A trial court removed the Cox’s son from the home and barred them from speaking to him about the topic of sex and gender.

Court documents contend that the child, identified as A.C., was removed from the home partly because of a severe eating disorder that allegedly could have gotten worse if he had returned home. 

Although DCS voluntarily dismissed all allegations that Mary and Jeremy abused or neglected their child, an Indiana Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s decision ruling the restriction on the parents’ religious instruction was permissible under state and federal constitutions.

The couple was only allowed to visit their son for 2-3 hours a week, but all other contact was limited. He eventually aged out of the foster care system while out of their custody.

Youngkin Feels the Heat over Same-Sex Marriage Betrayalby Suzanne Bowdey

More than a week after Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin’s (R) surprise signature on a controversial same-sex marriage bill, people everywhere are still trying to make sense of the decision. No one is quite sure what the openly religious businessman was trying to achieve, since the law has no practical effect except outraging the governor’s conservative base. And while there’s never a good time to insult your staunchest supporters, the move seemed especially tone deaf in a country moving awayfrom the extremism he endorsed. 

The warning signs have been everywhere — from the blistering criticism that GOP defectors faced on same-sex marriage in Congress to the polling. Whether the media wants to admit it or not, Americans are starting to back away from the experiment Obergefell unleashed on the country. Liberals know it. During the Respect for Marriage Act debate, Senator Krysten Sinema (I-Ariz.) told reporters that “the opposition was very, very strong.” “The attempts to derail this piece of legislation,” she admitted, “were probably more focused and robust than any other bills I’ve worked on in the last two years.” 

The country’s growing wariness for LGBT radicalism is obvious in everything from Time magazine’s panicky articles to surveys about marriage and the morality of same-sex relationships. Even some young people are jumping off the Left’s sexual bandwagon, hinting that they’ve finally had enough of this in-your-face agenda. It’s no wonder that Youngkin is facing fiercer-than-expected backlash. More and more Americans seem to be looking for the exits on this same-sex marry-go-round — only to watch leaders they trusted climb aboard. 

In the days since the bill became law, there’s been a united front of disgust for the governor’s departure from core values. From college Republican groups to grassroots leaders, Youngkin’s name conjures up the same words: “major disappointment.” Victoria Cobb, head of the Commonwealth’s socially conservative Family Foundation, said she actively lobbied the governor to veto the bill, amend it, or just let it become law — and yet, “he chose to affirmatively put his signature on it,” she lamented. Not only will this “divide Virginians,” Cobb insisted, but there are “obvious … worldview implications of redefining the bedrock institution of marriage in law.” She pointed out that some language in the policy even “paves the way to erasing girls form sports or worse.”

Local church leaders, who’d considered Youngkin an ally, didn’t hold back their frustration. To the governor’s claim that it shields people in Virginia pulpits, Nate Schlomann, executive pastor of the Village Church in North Chesterfield fired back that it isn’t the pastors who need protection. There was “no reason” for Youngkin to sign this, Schlomann explained. “We already have First Amendment protections as pastors,” he said. “My concern is that the logic of this bill will make all other Christians more vulnerable to persecution for their beliefs in the future.” 

And frankly, Schlomann said, “If Equality Virginia is celebrating your actions, you probably were not looking out for conservative Christians. This is a betrayal.”

Occoquan Bible Church’s David Schrock agreed. “When Youngkin was voted into office, Christians across the state of Virginia breathed a sigh of relief. He ran on a platform to honor faith, to protect families, and to reverse the liberal overreach of his predecessor,” the pastor pointed out. “But with this unexpected and unnecessary decision, Youngkin has not only reversed course: he has effectively broken the trust of the people who voted for him. For Christians, he has signed a bill that enshrines so-called same-sex marriage into law, but also he has exposed countless conscientious Virginians to legal threat.”

But perhaps some of the most powerful pushback came from Cornerstone Chapel’s Gary Hamrick. The senior pastor of one of northern Virginia’s largest churches was unequivocal when he addressed Youngkin’s mistake from the pulpit. “We have a moral obligation,” he told all three services, “I don’t care whether you’re governor or whether you are a housewife or whether you are a business owner; whether you’re a teacher or whatever capacity you serve — we always have a higher moral obligation to the word of God and God’s standard than man’s law. And whenever man’s law is in contradiction [with] the higher standard, we better take the higher standard every time.”

Hamrick explained that he’d texted privately with the governor, who graciously replied and offered to write a personal message to Cornerstone’s church family. The two men discussed the letter in a lengthy phone call that Pastor Gary detailed on “Washington Watch” with Family Research Council President Tony Perkins. Like Cobb, Hamrick felt Youngkin’s gravest offense was “as a believer, for him to put his signature to a law …. that is a clear violation of the higher moral standard of God’s law. That’s where I strongly disagree with what he did,” he said. “And for believers to know that he’s done this, it felt like a betrayal.”

Like so many people, Hamrick admitted, “… [W]e thought that he was going to govern in a way that was consistent with our biblical values. And on this one, in my opinion … he got this one wrong. He’s still a brother. Again … he’s not a perfect person. We’re all flawed, but he got this one wrong,” Pastor Gary emphasized. “And I just tell our folks, this is a good reminder: Put your confidence in the Lord, not in a political leader. They will sometimes disappoint. I, as a pastor, will sometimes disappoint. We are flawed people. And so keep your eyes on Jesus. That’s the bottom-line message.”

Perkins, who’s experienced this kind of political backstabbing firsthand, applauded Hamrick for reaching out and having a conversation with the governor. “This is where I think the role of pastors [is] so important, because, while he did not change this — this law is in effect now — I do think that next time he’s going to be a little more cautious,” he predicted. “I’ve actually encountered that myself … [and] the elected official in the particular case I was dealing with said, ‘You know what? I just wasn’t thinking through it. I should have called. Next time, when there’s an issue like this, I will.’ And I think part of it is helping people walk through this [to understand] how God speaks with clarity to so many of these issues.”

Unfortunately, that won’t save the thousands of Virginians who’ll almost certainly be affected by Youngkin’s treason. As Perkins pointed out, “Downstream from Governor Youngkin is going to be a teacher … a police officer, a fireman who is a believer and understands the Word of God as supreme. [And] they may lose their job as a result of what the governor did…”

Unfortunately, this happens far too often with the Republican Party. We vote for someone we think we can trust. only to have them turn tail and run from the very people that work so hard to put them into Office. The good people of Virginia who voted for him should immediately recall him, if possible from the governors mansion. RH

How Americans Are Paying for Biden’s Border Disaster

A record-breaking numbers of illegal immigrants have crossed the U.S. borders (northern and southern) every year of his presidency — each year worse than the last. U.S. Customs and Border Protection recorded:

1,956,519 illegal border crossings in fiscal year 2021.
2,766,582 in FY 2022.
3,201,144 in FY 2023.
1,231,213 since last October 1.
Family Research Council

We are seeing the intentional invasion and destruction of our American values. The moral and political landscape is being changed. Legal immigration is one thing, but this is an invasion. Rh