Here We Go Again!

Don’t Be Fooled Again

by Bill Wilson, KIN Senior Analyst

December 10, 2025 

WASH—Dec 10—KIN–Pfizer is back in the spotlight, rolling out trial results that claim its new mRNA influenza vaccine outperforms the standard flu shot. The headlines trumpet “better efficacy,” as if we’ve all forgotten the last three years. But FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary says it’s a non-starter, “The trial showed zero benefit” for seniors.” Approval denied. Pfizer rolled out a press release highlighting very carefully framed numbers. They say this new shot reduced flu cases more than the conventional vaccine. What they don’t discuss with the same enthusiasm is that they’re using the exact same COVID-19 mRNA platform that triggered adverse-event warnings that are still being debated today. Who would believe a word they say? Not the new FDA.

 We learned a lot during COVID, and most of it didn’t come from official talking points. Pfizer’s own early submissions showed declining protection within months and a spike in myocarditis and pericarditis—especially in young males. People who never had cardiac issues before suddenly found themselves navigating symptoms they didn’t expect. Even the FDA eventually added warnings to the label. And yet here we are again, being told that the same mRNA delivery system has now produced a superior flu shot. They want you to focus on the percentage improvements, not the risks. They want you to forget that “safe and effective” turned into “waning efficacy and unforeseen complications.” They want you to act like none of it happened. But facts are stubborn things, and memories—especially painful ones—tend to stick.

 Pfizer insists side effects from this new flu shot are “consistent” with its prior mRNA vaccines. That alone should set off alarms. Consistent with what? The platform associated with heart inflammation, blood clots, miscarriages, infertility? The protection that collapses over time? The trial data that treated serious adverse events as unfortunate footnotes? Americans aren’t anti-science. They’re anti-being-sold-something-twice. After COVID, who in their right mind takes Pfizer’s self-reported success at face value? If the company wants credibility, it should lead with long-term safety data, transparent adverse-event reporting, and real-world durability. What we’re getting instead is selective storytelling wrapped in marketing optimism, hoping you don’t notice the fine print repeating itself. Hats off to the FDA for not buying it this time.

 This is exactly how these drug companies bamboozle people into really bad health decisions with irreputable side effects. 

We all need discernment. You don’t have to be a scientist to apply common sense. If a company’s last blockbuster vaccine came with unresolved questions, diminishing returns, and documented risks, then any product built on that same blueprint deserves serious scrutiny. The moral here is simple: don’t let déjà vu turn into deception. Ephesians 5:6 first says, “Let no one deceive you with empty words.” Pfizer may believe the public has a short memory, but a whole lot of people are living with reminders that say otherwise. Demand honesty. Demand full data. Demand accountability from corporations that expect blind trust after earning the opposite because being fooled again is, say it with me…Stupidocrisy. 

Sources 

Pfizer mRNA flu shot failed FDA tests for Seniors – Epoch Times

Pfizer mRNA Influenza Phase 3 Efficacy Report – Contagion Live 

Pfizer Press Release on mRNA Influenza Vaccine – Pfizer 

FDA Safety Communication – Myocarditis/Pericarditis for mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines – FDA

Pfizer–BioNTech Original COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Publication (efficacy data) – PMC.NCBI

Fauci Files: Celebrated doc’s career dotted with ethics, safety controversies inside NIH

Reinstated whistleblower says Fauci failed to get involved when problems emerged on his management watch.

By Daniel Payne and John Solomon Just the News

Earlier this month, Dr. Anthony Fauci offered a pointed response to those who have challenged his stewardship of the pandemic as the nation’s infectious disease chief: “I think you can trust me,” he declared, citing his long record of service in government medicine.

That is exactly what Fauci’s National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) agency declared years ago to foster children in New York, Illinois and elsewhere, many of whom were enrolled in an AIDS drug trial without the promised patient protections. An investigation concluded the NIAID’s AIDS research division that reported to Fauci had failed in many cases to provide patient advocates to monitor the foster kids’ health as promised, and in some cases, as required by law.

In other words, a trust was broken.

Earlier this month, Dr. Anthony Fauci offered a pointed response to those who have challenged his stewardship of the pandemic as the nation’s infectious disease chief: “I think you can trust me,” he declared, citing his long record of service in government medicine.

Just the News review of three decades of Fauci’s leadership of the National Institutes of Health’s infectious disease arm found that while his agency has achieved many successes in the fights against AIDS and other infectious diseases it also produced several instances — like the foster children research — in which congressional, government ethics and internal watchdogs found safety or ethics lapses on his watch. They include:

  • A 2004 internal NIH review that concluded Fauci’s AIDS research division was a “troubled organization” where managers were creating a hostile atmosphere with “sexually explicit and colorful language” and “seemingly being unaware of the need for appropriate behavior, decorum and enforcement of good management practices and rules of supervision.”
  • A pregnant Tennessee woman who died in 2003 after she enrolled in NIH-funded research in hopes of saving her soon-to-be-born son from getting AIDS. A review found that doctors continued to administer an experimental drug regimen despite signs of liver failure.
  • At least 10 children in a pediatric AIDS drug study died in what an investigation concluded was a death toll “significantly higher” than expected and unexplained. 
  • An Office of Government Ethics investigation that cited NIAID for failing to review and clear two-thirds of its workers who were moonlighting in private industry for possible ethical conflicts.
  • A 1992 Department of Health and Human Services inspector general investigation that concluded NIAID failed to police two conflicts of interest in a vaccine experiment.

In 2005, the AIDS research division under Fauci’s agency was also required to reinstate a whistleblower, Dr. Jonathan Fishbein, its chief of ethics and regulatory compliance, after he and many lawmakers in both parties argued he had been wrongly fired in retaliation for raising safety concerns in some of the agency’s research.

In an interview with Just the News, Fishbein said this week that Fauci failed to take responsibility for the managers and researchers working below him when signs of trouble emerged, allowing problems to persist until others intervened. “Fauci is all about Fauci,” Fishbein said. “He loves being the headline. It’s his ego.”

Read all the article at https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/fauci-says-americans-should-trust-doctors-himself-his-career

This is the Dr. who shut the world down. Deep state friend of Clinton and Bill Gates, We have been played and the President has been played as well. We may never get the country back. Oh wait, the election is in November, it will be all over then.

Covid 19 Models

To anyone with any kind of common sense knows that the model used to shut the world down was not only flawed, but possible corrupt in the implication.  The Imperial College researchers ran a model that projected more than 500,00 deaths in Great Britain, and 2 million deaths in the U.S. as a result of Covid-19.  I distinctly remember hearing our President at a news conference state, that in the next two weeks the US would suffer over 200,000 deaths.  That briefing occurred about a month ago.  It never came close to that morbid number as I and many others knew.  Just as with Global Warming models that  are always shewed to cause fear and alarm.  Will justice come to those who caused the shutdown over flawed models?  Not sure that could be done, but at the very least questions should be asked and answered.  I am not holding my breath.  Un elected bureaucrats seem to lead a charmed life where none are held accountable.  Misery is not their problem,  Being the smartest egg head in the room is.

Wuhan Virus

Patriots this is not a mad virus seeking whom it may devour.  This is a virus that we need to be aware of but not fear.  This unbelievable fear is being promoted mostly by the MSM.  People of advanced age with underlining issues are most vulnerable.  This is not an epidemic, is is of concern though.  Be safe and treat this like a flu outbreak.

This has been weaponized to hurt our President and to destroy our economy.  Now is the time to show strength and buy into the market.  It will rebound, all the economic indicators are fantastic.  This will pass.  We bought some stocks on Friday morning and have money.  Stay strong Patriots!  We are WINNING!!