Why John Brennan, Peter Strzok and DOJ Needed Julian Assange Arrested – And Why UK Officials Obliged…

Posted on August 18, 2020 by sundance

According to reports in November of 2019, U.S Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr were spending time on a narrowed focus looking carefully at CIA activity in the 2016 presidential election. One recent quote from a media-voice increasingly sympathetic to a political deep-state notes:

“One British official with knowledge of Barr’s wish list presented to London commented that “it is like nothing we have come across before, they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services””. (Link)

It is interesting that quote came from a British intelligence official, as there appears to be  evidence of an extensive CIA operation that likely involved U.K. intelligence services. In addition, and as a direct outcome, there is an aspect to the CIA operation that overlaps with both a U.S. and U.K. need to keep Wikileaks founder Julian Assange under tight control. In this outline we will explain where corrupt U.S. and U.K. interests merge.

Former acting Attorney General Yates acknowledges Comey ‘went rogue’ on Flynn interview by Joseph Weber

Former acting Attorney General Sally Yates told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that the FBI acted without her authorization when interviewing incoming national security advisor Michael Flynn in January 2017.

When asked during the Senate hearing whether then-FBI Director James Comey “went rogue,” Yates replied, “You could use that term, yes.”

Yates is testify as part of the committee’s “Oversight of the Crossfire Hurricane Investigation,” which is focused on the FBI probe, under the Obama administration, into whether the 2016 Trump campaign colluded with Russia to influence the outcome of the race. 

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/former-acting-attorney-general-yates-acknowledges-comey-went-rogue-flynn

PRAYERS ANSWERED: FINALLY, JUSTICE FOR GENERAL FLYNN JUNE 25, 2020 |

“A federal appeals court Wednesday dismissed the government’s case against President Trump’s first national security adviser, Micheal Flynn, who was ensnared in the Russia collusion probe,” the Washington Times reported.

The court held that the appointment was “moot” since the charges have now been dropped.

In the majority decision, the two judges said trial Judge Emmet Sullivan didn’t have enough evidence to question the Justice Department’s prosecutorial decision in the case.”

FBI official questioned whether goal of Flynn interview was ‘to get him to lie’ – WND

By Chuck Ross Daily Caller News Foundation FBI notes unsealed on Wednesday show that bureau officials discussed whether the goal of an interview with Michael Flynn just days into the Trump administration was “to get him to lie” in order to get him fired or in legal jeopardy, Flynn’s lawyers say. “What is our goal?…

Source: FBI official questioned whether goal of Flynn interview was ‘to get him to lie’ – WND